海峽兩岸一家親的中國國民黨前行政院長蕭萬長先生 (Do we know Mr. Vincent Siew?)



現在臺灣人民真的認識這位曾擔任中國國民黨政權前行政院長的
蕭萬長先生嗎? 即便他曾在中國國民黨專權統治的時代擔任那至高的中華民國行政院長,他亦只能向人坦承表示:對處理黑金掏空的大弊案無能為力!

臺灣人民真的認識現在這位在臺灣嘉義長大的前行政院長嗎?曾幾何時他竟也嫌起臺灣人民好不容易以鮮血換來的一些今日臺灣民主環境是對他所屬的中國國民黨政權礙手礙腳了!

當然,我們願意祝福蕭前院長(和你的下一代女兒、女婿)都能在中國大陸有所發展,並能說服對岸「一黨獨大」的中國共產黨領導人他(註:一般中國大陸新聞媒體稱他為「台灣知名人士」,而不尊稱他為「前中華民國行政院長」)所提「兩岸共同市場」的理想,但若他真的希望繼續在故鄉負責臺灣這國家的執政,總應該對過去在中國國民黨專權的時代,他身為中華民國的行政院長,竟仍對外表示他無力遏止當時黑金橫行、金融嚴重掏空,及無法將重大經濟罪犯繩之以法等之無奈有所解釋!

他也應該提出為何將來他可以比過去更有能力處理臺灣黑金氾濫的問題,他憑什麼?而且,對於過去因他行政團隊無力保護而遭受損害的臺灣人民,他要怎樣把公理正義再帶回給台灣人民呢?

在這2008年,臺灣人民將要選舉臺灣總統和副總統的前夕,我們還是應該要嚴肅的請教蕭萬長先生:(1) 至今中國共產黨政權堅持不放棄以武力攻擊臺灣,如果將來因多數台灣人民不願認同臺灣是中國大陸的一部分,或不願意臺灣被中國大陸統一,而遭受中共以武力攻擊臺灣國時,你個人是否會因須兼顧兒女親情之考量而產生和臺灣國家利益有衝突(conflicts of interest) 的困難?如果你有面臨這種困難的可能性,你個人認為身為臺灣國家領導人是否應依照現今臺灣行政程序法,自行請求迴避呢?在目前臺灣和中共仍處於敵對狀態,你要如何在處處須請求迴避之情況下去當臺灣總統府的副手? (2)可否請你說服臺灣人民,你絕不可能會有前述親情和國家利益有衝突困難的時候或機會? (3)可否請你向臺灣人民說明:為何當時在你擔任(由中國國民黨政權主導)中華民國的行政院長時(1997-2000),你竟無法解決台灣各地金融弊案之蔓延和黑金勢力掏空臺灣社會的問題? (4) 在過去七、八年間,當你奔走臺灣海峽兩岸,你可曾以”臺灣知名人士”之身分,強烈請求或呼籲中國大陸當局應將逃亡在中國的重大經濟罪犯全數遣返臺灣伏法?(就如同中華民國政權將逃亡到臺灣的”反共義士”都全遣返中國!)

我個人認為在自由、民主和法治的現今臺灣,人民向蕭萬長先生提出這些問題或質疑應並不過分;如果在臺灣總統和副總統選舉之前,真的沒有許多臺灣人民認為蕭萬長先生應該要主動回應上述這些問題時,那或許多數臺灣人民已經不在意臺灣是不是一個國家,因為在這裡,那60年流亡在臺灣的中國國民黨政權留下給台灣人民的是一個”日頭赤炎炎,隨人顧性命”的社會!臺灣是這樣嗎?還是那些中國國民黨政權的核心成員都已認為臺灣就是這樣朝不保夕的社會?就像前些時候有位中共官員公開向臺灣的人民說的:”誰理你!”

Do we really know Mr. Vincent Siew – the ex-Premier of ROC government? In June of 2007, Mr. Vincent Siew became the running mate for KMT presidential nominee Ma Ying-Jeou. The 2008 run is Siew’s second ticket, having been selected also as the vice-presidential candidate of Lien Chan’s KMT ticket in 2000.

Will Mr. Siew suddenly become capable of handling what he was unable to accomplish in the past while he was the Chief of KMT Party-led ROC Executive Yuan (from year 1997 to 2000)?

References:

“方儷祥為方伯謙佷兒方瑩將軍的女兒,方瑩將軍曾任國民黨海軍上海基地司令,後成為新中國海軍第一個航海長…”

[“中国近代名人之后”:萧如婷——方莹将军外孙媳,萧万长的大女儿] 。

資訊來源

Facebook 留言
府城通訊社

28 thoughts on “海峽兩岸一家親的中國國民黨前行政院長蕭萬長先生 (Do we know Mr. Vincent Siew?)

  1. To eastsidelife: I wish I could love KMT Party like you! (Actually, I have many friends who are KMT Party members.) But, it is wrong that the KMT Party has never repaid the families of those who were martyred in the Taiwan 228 Massacres and in the 38-year-long White-terror Era, not even a penny or any sincere apology!

  2. To eastsidelife: cont) In addition, the top KMT Party politicians never prove that they can handle any serious business scandals and criminals! Not to mention that the KMT Party-led ROC regime has failed totally to protect the assets/investment of Taiwan people from any serious business/bank frauds! Why can't they? They are the cohorts in the same Party!

  3. To eastsidelife: It is OK for you to side with the KMT Party, but who are to side with those who have been suffered from the inability of that KMT Party regime to protecting their lives or assets!

    No harsh feeling, I am just doing my part to remind Mr. Siew of his major responsibilities (as a Taiwan politician), if he can win! You can do this too!

  4. To eastsidelife: (cont) I hope you can understand that 'to hate' is very different from 'to tell the facts and honest opinions (with good intentions!)' Please try not to categorically describe all criticisms as "hate".

    Personally, I do not 'hate' any KMT politicians (including Mr. Siew). I wish them the best, but I wish they know what they are doing and will not do any harms to their Taiwan countrymen.

  5. To eastsidelife: (cont'd) And, why do you think that Mr. V, Siew and the other KMT Party politicians could not bear with my videos and would not like people to tell them some honest opinions, even occasionally?

  6. To cherrybayern: It is too bad that you, as a resident living in China, do not even know how your single CCP dominates in China! And, I guess you are one of those minorities in China who will always be happy to see the CCP use tanks to crush your own people whenever it seems necessary! That is probably what you think how the democracy should work!

  7. To cherrybayern: Only those minorities who have gained advantages in autoritarian regimes and in one-party-dominated countries (including China) will uphold your opinions.

    The main reasons that the democratization seems slow or difficult in some Asian countries (like China) are because the media therein are very much manipulated and the people are brainwashed to believe they are inferior to their dictators or whoever dominate their states!

  8. To amtbtotw: Your comments do NOT help the democratization of Free Taiwan! If you wish to criticize the DPP, please go elsewhere. And, your condemning Taiwan DPP here can't make me believe that the KMT Party has ever changed or make that KMT Party become innocent!

  9. To jibinchen: (1) 三立新聞是否客觀,見仁見智,今日臺灣人民都可以有個人的看法並自由批判; (2) 過去8年,ROC Government in exile 是否有效率的運轉,應該和中國國民黨掌控的立法院及多數只能附和KMT的ROC公務員組合體的行政與司法獨立執行能力與效率有最大的關係;

  10. [cont.} (3) 即使在古今最英明的皇帝系統下,一般人民還是只能過著"隨人顧性命"的生存環境,因為沒有任何人民敢去碰觸那掌握權和利的政權核心;(4) 如果您覺得無法適應並願意自己投入幫助臺灣正邁向民主化的困難環境,我建議您如有機會,不妨去極權、一黨獨大、或共產國家生活個幾年,然後再回頭來看臺灣人民為擺脫中國國民黨政權及爭取自由和真民主,所要付出的犧牲和努力,也許才會疼惜臺灣;

  11. [cont.] (5) 今日你仍有自由去批判三立的立場,但應知道在目前新加坡和在你出世之前的臺灣人民,連批判政府和新聞報導的自由都沒有!

    Therefore, enjoy Taiwan democracy while you can!

  12. 自己的同胞?
    共產黨先解散再說…
    我沒看過秦川.三峽.大漠
    我看過沙漠化後的飛塵飛到台灣
    你說的民族是哪個民族.你有考慮到台灣原住民嗎?

  13. To fish81099: If you can ever convince the heads of PRC Regime to remove all missiles targeting at Taiwan, I would immediately delete all my comments here. If you can NOT do anything at all on changing the hostile attitudes of PRC Regime towards Taiwan People, please tell us how you are going to assure that Mr. Vincent Siew won't daily run into problems of conflicts of interest, specifically whenever he deals with the hostile PRC Regime.

  14. To fish81099: (cont.) On the contrary to what you commented here, I am trying my best to remind Mr. Siew that at the time when he served as the chief of the Executive Yuan of ROC Regime (from 1998 to 2000), many bank/business scandals or failures occurred and to date the victims are still not compensated. And the criminals are still at large! In my view, Mr. Siew did not do anything at that time to suppress the surging criminal waves and that caused people to vote for DPP Party for a change.

  15. To xinyi1987: I am not a DPP member and I only support those presidential candidates who are honest and sincere. Herein this video, I was just trying to remind Mr. Siew that he was once the chief of the Executive Yuan of ROC Regime right before year 2000 and that he should know there are laws and ethics that regulate personal conflicts of interest.

  16. ok, i have to appologize to you. I didn't watch all your videos but it seemed that all of them were about the KMT. How about making some comments about DPP?

  17. To kzmmike: That time will never come as long as PRC is still led by the CCP! We have seen enough of the KMT exiled from China: one-party-led regime can only rule its people by political/military suppresion, censoring/manipulating the media, and telling lies.

    What is "炎黄子孙"?! We are all descendants of Homo sapiens originated from Africa – that is the only truth about human beings! And the PRC is but a temporary political regime established on the southeast area of the Eurasian Plate on Earth!

  18. To efaxing: Go check your DNA before you call others names! You cannot expect to alter yourself to other beings simply by typing bad words on the internet. Incidentally, you have to know that monkeys can be kinder than devious human beings.

  19. 說你是香蕉人
    没根的人
    你以為你的陳詞滥調很有用?中共腐敗 就可以独立嗎?我們都是從非洲來的 權且成立 那你算什麼了 你就是個漂泊的幽魂 像你這種人 戰爭中第一個做叛徒的就是你!

  20. 順便鄙視下三立這個臭婊子 三立制作假新聞真是一流 看透了綠龜的真面目 果然是個徹頭徹尾的反華電視台!綠龜們 你們想独立嗎 那就戰場見 老子保證拿槍來 到時别陽痿了!

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *